Recent updates in ''

“Is Clinton’s 2012 Campaign Under Way?” from Francis Moore Lappe

I thought I was perhaps being a touch paranoid back in March in my long post Clinton a Republican (if she can’t win).

Then in April House Democratic Whip James Clyburn also brought up the scary rumors that Clinton was purposely trying to derail Obama to heighten her own future prospects.

For the latest on the paranoid take on the primary drama (which I fully subscribe to, of course), see Frances Moore Lappe’s post at The Huffington Post - Is Clinton’s 2012 Campaign Under Way?:

“We know Hillary Clinton is smart, and we so can assume that for some time she has known, as well as anyone, that it is virtually impossible for her to become the Democratic nominee for President in 2008. So what could explain her continuing to battle, risking her party’s approbation?

We fear there is one explanation that fits too well: that Clinton is actually already fighting the 2012 race. We hope we are wrong. But within this frame, her actions do make perfect sense.
Clinton seems to be doing her best to weaken Obama’s candidacy and therefore the likelihood that he can win against McCain. With that result, she could say, ‘I told you so’ and offer herself as the 2012 savior of the Democratic Party. Her husband’s statement last weekend, that the Democrats were more likely to lose in November if she is not the nominee, fits that pattern.”

A lot of others are beginning to catch the same paranoia…

Young Hillary Clinton

This video is hilarious:

Young Hillary Clinton

(Via Living the Scientific Life blog on ScienceBlogs)

Why I’m voting for Obama

Obama sign
Barack Obama has inspired me to do some things that I have never done before now. The first was to give money to a political campaign. Not big money, but to the tune of a couple of hundred dollars. I want him to succeed so I’m helping in that small way that I can. Even bigger for me than giving money, was putting an Obama bumpersticker on my car. I’ve always been of the feeling that the less others know about you the better, so I’ve stayed away from political bumperstickers since I was a teenager. I’m not interested in being judged or prejudged by whoever happens to be behind me. Especially not while living in NC, where the range of people and political beliefs can be quite large in the metropolitan areas, but rather narrower in the country. Not sure whether this is paranoia or just plan cowardice, but whichever, I’m past it now. I want people to know who I support and believe in.

Yard signs have also not been my (or my wife’s) thing in the past. We just weren’t interested in broadcasting our politics to the world or, at the least, to our neighbors. Now we have two Obama signs gracing our yard. Even stranger for me, I couldn’t put these signs out until the yard was properly mowed and trimmed. Not my favorite activity and one I’m likely to put off at any opportunity. This time though, I didn’t want people to think: “look, the guy with the crappy lawn is supporting Obama”. Obama has enough problems with guilt-by-association to also be saddled with my slovenly lawn habits.

Additionally, the bumpersticker is making me drive better. I don’t want to cut anyone off and have them not vote for the man because they think I drive like an asshole. Not that I do, it’s just that I’m extra conscious of it now.

Politically, I consider myself to be an independent but definitely a left-leaning one. Since I could vote, the choices of presidential candidates have been frequently rather poor. Dukakis and Bush in 1988, Clinton, Bush and Perot in 1992, Clinton, Dole and Perot in 1996, Gore and Bush in 2000, Kerry and Bush in 2004. I’ve held my nose and voted for the Democratic candidate before, but I’ve also lodged the protest vote before and voted for Perot. Honestly, most of the time I haven’t seen too much of a difference between the candidates. The Democrats of Bill and Hillary’s group and the Rebuplicans in the mold of Bush Sr. and Dole were pretty similar in many respects. I would’ve thought the same of Gore and Bush Jr, but George quickly disabused me (and the world) that he was in anyway in the same vein. Whole new world of destructiveness under him.

So these last 8 years of our current leader has made me both scared and hopeful for our future. I’m scared of what we have become as a nation. To me it seems at times that we are simultaneously weaker and more arrogant than we were. Much weaker in comparison to what we could be and much more arrogant than what we are, in any way, could justify. Don’t get me wrong, we are a tremendous country, but our belief in our own exceptionalism has continuously let us overlook our flaws and problems. And the problems are many and daunting. Poverty, war and disease. Crumbling education, infrastructure, air travel and health care systems. And the reasons for these are as varied as the problems are daunting. Some caused by greed, some just plain laziness, others by incompetent leadership more concerned with the quick political boost than the long term solution. We really, really need leaders that can see the problems, talk to us honestly about them and maybe help lead us to long term solutions.

As Thomas Friedman put it in the NY Times yesterday:

Who will tell the people? We are not who we think we are. We are living on borrowed time and borrowed dimes. We still have all the potential for greatness, but only if we get back to work on our country.

I don’t know if Barack Obama can lead that, but the notion that the idealism he has inspired in so many young people doesn’t matter is dead wrong. “Of course, hope alone is not enough,” says Tim Shriver, chairman of Special Olympics, “but it’s not trivial. It’s not trivial to inspire people to want to get up and do something with someone else.”

It is especially not trivial now, because millions of Americans are dying to be enlisted — enlisted to fix education, enlisted to research renewable energy, enlisted to repair our infrastructure, enlisted to help others. Look at the kids lining up to join Teach for America. They want our country to matter again. They want it to be about building wealth and dignity — big profits and big purposes. When we just do one, we are less than the sum of our parts. When we do both, said Shriver, “no one can touch us.”

The past 8 years of arrogance and fearful weakness are what scare me and give me cause for alarm in looking towards my daughter’s future. What will the world be like when she is grown? Will we continue down that path, deluding ourselves that bombs and outrageously rich CEOs make us a better country or will we start trying to change our lives for the better? Will she grow up wanting to be a teacher or a Doctor or a Hilton girl? This is where the hope comes in. I see her and her concern for others and for fairness in all things and I know that on some level it will get better in the near future. Even with McCain is will be better compared to the past 8 years under Bush. For all McCain’s faults, the man does have a brain.

But I see most hope for real change, exciting change that alters the way we think and act as a nation, under Obama. With Obama I see a future for my daughter that is full of perils and full of work but most importantly full of hope and promise. So my signs are up, my bumpersticker on and tomorrow I’ll go cast my vote for what I hope to be a far better future.

57 Pictures of an Ant

Ant #57In an act of possibly sanity saving slackerness, I went to my favorite contemplative spot yesterday. It’s an oddly bucolic, visually perfect little pond buzzing with dragonflys, loud frogs and turtles. I say “oddly” because it’s also just over the hill from a gravel quarry. The warning tones of dump trucks mix freely with burps of frogs. Still I like it.
So, squatting in the reeds next to the pond I saw an ant. I then proceeded to take 57 photos of this ant. Not at all surprisingly, most of these pictures sucked in a large way. But the goal wasn’t really to get a good picture, it was to stop thinking about other crap. Which I did. Felt stupidly and inanely zenlike. I loved it.